To do
From Linux NFS
(Difference between revisions)
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/NFSv4_server_priorities.html Priority list for the Linux NFS server] | * [http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/NFSv4_server_priorities.html Priority list for the Linux NFS server] | ||
- | Some specific projects; follow links for more details on design requirements and implementation plans. | + | Some specific projects; follow links for more details on design requirements and implementation plans. If you intend to work on any of these, please keep in close contact with other developers, using nfsv4@linux-nfs.org. |
* [[pseudofilesystem improvements]]: The NFSv4 server currently patches together export paths in a way that is inconsistent with NFSv2 and NFSv3 and causes severe problems for automount users. | * [[pseudofilesystem improvements]]: The NFSv4 server currently patches together export paths in a way that is inconsistent with NFSv2 and NFSv3 and causes severe problems for automount users. | ||
* [[gss callbacks]]: We currently don't support rpcsec_gss security on the callback channel, which means that if you mount with krb5 then you don't get the benefit of delegations. | * [[gss callbacks]]: We currently don't support rpcsec_gss security on the callback channel, which means that if you mount with krb5 then you don't get the benefit of delegations. | ||
+ | * [[client ACL tools]]: The client ACL utilities need some work |
Revision as of 02:15, 4 September 2006
See also:
Some specific projects; follow links for more details on design requirements and implementation plans. If you intend to work on any of these, please keep in close contact with other developers, using nfsv4@linux-nfs.org.
- pseudofilesystem improvements: The NFSv4 server currently patches together export paths in a way that is inconsistent with NFSv2 and NFSv3 and causes severe problems for automount users.
- gss callbacks: We currently don't support rpcsec_gss security on the callback channel, which means that if you mount with krb5 then you don't get the benefit of delegations.
- client ACL tools: The client ACL utilities need some work