Matrix security section

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 02:21, 19 August 2007

ID	test	status	notes
V.A.1	Audit the NFSv4 server code	New
V.A.2	Audit the NFSv4 client code	New
V.A.3	Audit the rpcbind / portmap code	New
V.A.4	Audit the krb5 code	DONE	Assuming MIT krb5 libs are already reviewed
V.A.5	Audit the idmapd code	New
V.A.6	Audit the mountd	New
V.A.7	Audit the RPC authentication code (gssd, authsys, etc.)	New

ID	test	status	owner	notes
V.B.1	Run Stanford/Coverity Checker periodically	New
V.B.2	Run SMATCH as regression test periodically	New
V.B.3	Run FlawFinder as regression test periodically	New
V.B.4	Run Sparse as regression test periodically	In Progress	OSDL	Data is reported for CITI kernels; need to understand how to analyze it

ID	test	tool test	status	owner	notes
V.C.1	Verify that only administrative users can access admin tools and config files		New		Perhaps run this in a test suite

ID	test	status	notes
V.D.1	Review Authentication/ACL feature design	New	U Mich has done some NFS2/3 ACL testing 10/04
V.D.2	Review each security flavor feature design Krb5 Spkm3	New
V.D.3	Review security negotiation feature design	New	Still needs some implementation work
V.D.4	Review named attributes feature design	New	Still needs some implementation work
V.D.5	Review supporting advanced security flavors on the callback channel design	New	Still needs some implementation work
V.D.6	Penetration testing for client callback implementation	New

ID	test	status
V.E.1	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently tests Authentication/ACL	New
V.E.2	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently covers each security flavor Krb5 Spkm3	New
V.E.3	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently covers security negotiation	New
V.E.4	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently covers named attributes	New
V.E.5	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently covers advanced security flavors on callback channel	New
V.E.6	Ensure a functionality test sufficiently covers penetration testing for client callback implementation	New

ID	test	status	owner	notes
V.F.1	Identify security issues assuming attack from client-side	Open	Bull	Bull planning on creating a list of issues in 2005 NFSv4 client Denial of service Userland daemons Mount and other nfs utils
V.F.2	Identify security issues assuming attack from server-side	Open	Bull	Bull planning on creating a list of issues in 2005
V.F.3	Identify security/privacy issues assuming listening by an active or passive third party	Open'	Bull	Bull planning on creating a list of issues in 2005

ID	test	tool test	status	owner	notes
V.G.1	Two v4 domains; kerberos, ACLs in one realm; file system in another		New		Still experimental

ID	test	status
V.H.1	Ensure there is high level design documentation of NFSv4 security Start with Bruce's paper Security mechanisms Client responsibilities Server responsibilities	New
V.H.2	Ensure there is inline documentation for security related code in kernel	New
V.H.3	Ensure there is inline documentation for GSS API (libgssapi, librpcsecgss)	New
V.H.4	Ensure there is inline documentation for nfsv4 libraries	New

ID	test	tool test	status	owner	notes
V.I.1	Verify proper functionality/security correctness of NFSv4 in a VPN environment		New		Venkat will write use case

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 |Run Sparse as regression test periodically
 |
-|'''Open'''
+|'''In Progress'''
 |OSDL
-|
+|Data is reported for CITI kernels; need to understand how to analyze it
 |}
@@ Line 221: / Line 221: @@
 |}
-== Attack and penetration security review ==
+==[[Security_Attack_Penetration|Attack and penetration security review]]==
 {|border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" style="font-size: 85%; border: gray solid 1px; border-collapse: collapse; text-align: center; width: 100%
 !style="background: #ececec;"|'''ID
@@ Line 255: / Line 255: @@
 |Bull planning on creating a list of issues in 2005
 |}
 == Cross realm ==