From Linux NFS
IV.A Comparison of NFSv4 vs. NFSv3 for common use cases
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.A.1
| Time to perform sequence of unique read/write operations
| Iozone
| Open
| Bull
| Done by Bull in 2004
|
| IV.A.2
| Time to perform sequence of cacheable read/write operations
| Iozone
| New
|
|
|
| IV.A.3
| Random reads/writes/opens from many clients to one server
| Iozone
| Open
| Bull
| Done by Bull in 2004
|
| IV.A.4
| Industry standard loads
| SpecSFS, Specweb99
| New
|
| Tools does not exist
|
| IV.A.5
| Time to read file from beginning to end and then rewrite it
| IOzone
| In progress
| Bull
| Part of IOZone standard tests
|
| IV.A.6
| Time for appending info to a log file sporadically over time
| Iozone
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.7
| Metadata - open/close intensive workload
| Iozone
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.8
| Metadata - directory scanning
| Iozone
| Open
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.9
| Metadata - create/delete
| Iozone
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.10
| Metadata - changing attributes (chown, chmod) while dir scanning
| IOZone
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.11
| How many locks can be made and released over time
| FFsB
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.A.12
| Comparison of speeds attainable for different NIC cards
|
|
|
|
|
IV.B NFSv4 on TCP vs. RDMA
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.B
| Compare latency, throughput, etc. of NFSv4 on TCP vs. RDMA
|
| New
|
| Only prototypes exist currently; possibly will be more fully implemented by end of 2005
|
IV.C Test performance on different local filesystems
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.C.1
| Analyze whether file system choice affects performance
| Iozone
| Done
| Bull
| NFSv4 performances do not depend on the local file-system used
|
| IV.C.2
| Test performance with Ext2 on server with metadata /acls
| IOZone/FFsB
|
|
|
|
| IV.C.3
| Test performance with ext3 on server with metadata / acls
| IOZone/FFsB
| New
|
|
|
| IV.C.4
| Test performance with Reiser3 on server with metadata / acls
| IOZone/FFsB
| New
|
|
|
| IV.C.5
| Test performance with xfs on server with metadata / acls
| IOZone/FFsB
| New
|
|
|
| IV.C.6
| Test performance with jfs on server with metadata / acls
| IOZone/FFsB
| New
|
|
|
| IV.C.7
| Test performance with Reiser4 on server with metadata /acls
| IOZone/FFsB
| New
|
|
|
IV.D Test perfomance on different cluster filesystems
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.D.1
| Test performance when using GFS cluster file system
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.D.2
| Test performance when using Luster cluster file system
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.D.3
| Test performance when using GPFS cluster file system
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.D.4
| Test performance when using Polyserve cluster file system
|
| New
|
|
|
IV.E Evaluation in various load scenarios
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.E.1
| Test performance with large numbers of small (<4k) files
| addhoc tool
| In progress
| Bull
| While most NFS functionnalities are not affected by the number of files (1 000 000 of empty files), some bash functions are not responding : ls (answer take more than 15 hours). This question will be splited in sub topics soon.
|
| IV.E.2
| Test performance with a few very large (>1G) files
| IOzone
| Open
| Bull
| Goals need some clarifications
|
| IV.E.3
| 4-16 clients generating high load on 1 server in lab environment
| Mail/user dir
| New
| Bull
|
|
| IV.E.4
| 2000-5000 clients on 5-10 servers in production environment
| Clusters
| New
| NetApps
|
|
| IV.E.5
| NFS "Cluster" scenario with 1000+ clients and several servers
| Film industry, HPC or visualization workload
| New
|
|
|
| IV.E.6
| NFS front end with cluster backend; 100+ clients
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.E.7
| Pure cluster; 100+ clients
|
| New
|
|
|
Evaluation in stress scenarios
| ID
| test
| tool test
| status
| owner
| notes
|
| IV.F.1
| Measure performance of server when in limited resource situations :
- Low memory / heavy swap space usage
- High inode count situations
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.F.2
| Measure performance of client when in limited resource situations :
- Low memory / heavy swap space usage
- Low/saturated network bandwidth
|
| New
|
|
|
| IV.F.3
| Graceful failure mode
|
| New
|
| See Chuck for more info
|
| IV.F.4
| Measure memory/network/CPU efficiency of client for fixed workload
| IOzone - FFsB
| In progress
| Bull
|
|
Scalability (performance)
|IV.G.
|Verify server scalability with clients generating various basic requests (ACCESS, GETATTR, et al)
|Iozone
|New
|
|
|-
|IV.G.2
|Verify server scalability with clients using compound requests
|Iozone
|New
|
|
|-
|IV.G.3
|Measure effects of scaling up number of connections
|IOZone
|New
|Bull
|SMP - Measure number of mounts per second on client and server
|-
|IV.G.4
|Measure effects of increasing number of files
|Addhoc tool
|Open
|Bull
|
|-
|IV.G.5
|Measure effects of increasing file size (with/without cache)
|IOzone
|Open
|Bull
|
|-
|IV.G.6
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|IV.G.7
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|IV.G.8
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|IV.G.9
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|IV.G.10
|
|
|
|
|
|-
