Readdir ls -f graphs

From Linux NFS

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 23: Line 23:
* [[File:v4_ls_f_noplus_sys.jpg]]
* [[File:v4_ls_f_noplus_sys.jpg]]
* [[File:v4_ls_f_plus_sys.jpg]]
* [[File:v4_ls_f_plus_sys.jpg]]
 +
** Unmodified 2.6.38 gives the worst performance here.  All other kernels seem to give roughly the same results.
== RPC ops ==
== RPC ops ==

Revision as of 17:29, 7 April 2011

    36: Linux 2.6.36
36NORC: Linux 2.6.36 (without readdir cap)
    38: Linux 2.6.38
  38RC: Linux 2.6.38 (with readdir cap added back)
  38NB: Linux 2.6.38 (with Neil Brown's patch and loop detection)

Contents

Real

NFS v3

  • V3 ls f noplus real.jpg
  • V3 ls f plus real.jpg
    • 2.6.38 performs the same as 2.6.36 with the readdir plus cap removed. Using readdir rather than readdir plus is faster in this case.

NFS v4

  • V4 ls f noplus real.jpg
  • V4 ls f plus real.jpg

Sys

NFS v3

  • V3 ls f noplus sys.jpg
  • V3 ls f plus sys.jpg

NFS v4

  • V4 ls f noplus sys.jpg
  • V4 ls f plus sys.jpg
    • Unmodified 2.6.38 gives the worst performance here. All other kernels seem to give roughly the same results.

RPC ops

NFS v3

  • V3 ls f noplus rpc.jpg
  • V3 ls f plus rpc.jpg

NFS v4

  • V4 ls f noplus rpc.jpg
  • V4 ls f plus rpc.jpg
Personal tools